Posted by: beautifulheritage | March 8, 2008

The world, she is topsy-turvy

I’m confused. Again.

See, I was reading a little book to my two-year-old when my second-oldest daughter pointed out something strange to me. Let me see if you can guess what it is. Here is the picture in question:

Do you see it? Or, more to the point, NOT see it? It is a common Jersey Cow, lovely in its own right, with its adorable little calf there beside it. All is well so far. But take a gander at this other photo of a Jersey Cow.

 

NOW do you see it? The first picture…the one in the educational children’s book…there is no veiny, hangy-downy, milk-producing, teat sprouting UDDER.

I mean, honestly.

Honestly!

Obviously the sight of a giant udder would be too scandalous for the tender eyes of a child. Obviously such a thing is worthy of the most severe censorship. Obviously nightmares featuring humongous pink mammary glands dancing about on their teats would haunt the minds of toddlers everywhere if they were subjected to such an abhorrent sight.

Actually, I think those same nightmares are called daydreams for the average teenaged male human. But I digress.

Where there should be a life-sustaining piece of anatomy, there is instead tight, smooth skin. The child reading the book will not be disturbed by any puzzlement concerning the function of the organ, and the parent will be spared the mental trauma of having to explain said organ’s function. Peace will reign.

Peace, and ignorance.

Where am I going with this? I’m not really sure. Frankly, there are so many delightful directions into which I could veer with this rant that I’m overwhelmed. But I’ll say this:

I think the cow in the original photo does, indeed, have an udder. The fact is, she is a young cow. Her udder is undeveloped as of yet. She is herself calf-less. She is not the mama to the calf in the photo. She is perhaps his babysitter, or his nubile and comely older sister. In any case, she was viewed as more suitable for photographing.

I feel it is my duty to take up the cause of mama bovines everywhere and protest this prejudice. There is nothing…nothing…offensive about the equipment by which milk is produced. By presenting this picture to children as the ideal appearance for a mother cow, they are setting the stage for an entire generation to be unaccepting of reality and continually chasing after youth as the standard of perfection.

Wait. Am I talking about cows? Or am I talking about this?

This, which happens to be right at a young child’s eye level in just about every store I have been in. In which the model just happens to be wearing not much more than a bunch of necklaces.

But hey, that’s okay. Because, you know…she’s purdy. And young. And don’t forget smooth-skinned. And air-brushed beyond reason.

And reality? God forbid reality should intrude upon our consciences.

Responses

LOLOL

M

I’m surprised the calf was drinking from a bottle feeder machine thingy that they use.

that was supposed to say
I’m surprised the calf wasn’t drinking from a bottle feeder machine thingy that they use.

Too funny!
And true. What the heck?
I saw that SI cover just yesterday at the store. It’s funny you posted just her face because honestly, I didn’t even see it. All I saw were the jewels and how strategically placed they were. Then you know when I’ve been watching too much America’s Top Model when I figured they had to airbrush………
Oh my, where in the world am I going with this………
Anyway!!!! Very funny post! :)

Hear, hear!

Look at you and all your fancy new categories!

“nightmares featuring humongous pink mammary glands dancing about on their teats….Actually, I think those same nightmares are called daydreams for the average teenaged male human. But I digress.” LOL!

The SI mag reminds me of the people who tell you “If you don’t like that particular tv show, just turn it off or don’t watch it.”

Well a lot good that does when they show the most vulgar snippets in commercials from the show all day long.

So mixed up indeed.

I do think they find those giant mammary glands on a cow offensive and not attractive…but like you mentioned, same sort of people have no problem viewing mammary glands of the female sort so long as it isn’t during the actual use of them.

Now you’re talking boobs! I swear, Jenni, this blog gets more x-rated as the days go by.

This whole post made me think of The Barnyard–you know, where even the males have huge udders. Too funny. That one caused confusion everywhere, too.

Oh my gosh, that is hilarious…and sick.

I’m so glad I’m not a cow.

But. . .it IS a picture of a cow. Perhaps the person responsible for selecting the stock (no pun intended) photos didn’t have any clue. And perhaps the person captioning the photo didn’t either. I wouldn’t boil it down to a bovine vs. human mammary exposure kind of thing.

Amanda,

Yes, well…that’s not entirely accurate.

And you know, I’m ALL about being entirely accurate.

;o)

At the very least, they should have put “heifer” instead of cow, since that is the appropriate moniker for an unbred female bovine. I don’t think that would have been considered over the kids’ heads, since they put “combine harvester” on a subsequent page.

LOL!

Yes, very interesting points. I am encouraged that your daughter took note.

I agree wholeheartedly. I called my Walmart and complained, seriously how is that ok for public viewing!!!
Grrrrrr. Don’t get me started!

Are you sure that’s a jersey cow or a beef cow? ‘Cause I think the udder is tucked up more in a beef cow. What do I know . . . my grandpa was a dairy farmer and I was a city kid!

I just found your blog via Rocks in My Dryer, I think. Very funny post!

I simply cannot believe you had the audacity to put a photo of a cow on your blog with its UDDERS SHOWING!!!

Have you no cooth? Are you trying to make worse the already horrible problem that is bovine porn*graphy?

Oh, now wait, I think I got that backwards. Never mind.

:o)

(Found you through Shannon, I have enjoyed what I have read, and I loved today’s poem!)

Amen sister…well said.

That’s actually pretty funny. I never noticed my children’s books censored in that way, but my eyes have been opened!

AMEN! Amazing that even the cows have to be censured/airbrushed. Thanks for your blog…I’m enjoying catching up!

Oh, you are so very right! The very idea, airbrushing a cow. Hmpf!

I’m really enjoying your witty blog! Funny stuff!

Very good comparisons! :)

I remember when my youngest daughter was 3 our big issue with her was keeping her clothes on. If she got a drop of water on anything she immediately peeled it off. So we spent a lot of time talking about how clothing in public was a good thing.

Then she came grocery shopping and saw the magazines. She took one look at the cover of Cosmo and said to me, “But Mommy, that lady is trying to take her clothes off!”. And then she started pulling at her shirt.

I really wish they would move those magazines. Or not have them at all. :)

Visit To Love, Honor and Vacuum today!

Spot on!
It makes me sad to see those ‘touchups’ in almost every aspect of our culture…
I’ll certainly visit again!
Jenni aka Mommy Bee

I was at Walgreens the other day with all my tribe in tow when I saw that badboy (SI) staring right at me. I grabbed every magazine and put them waaayyyyy up on top and no longer on eye level of children. Haha, take that!

we have jersey dairy cows and my children know exactly what udders look like and what to do with them, and the end result, ICE CREAM! yay!

as for those nasty magazines if I see them in the store I will take an innocent magazine and put it in front of them, and I will do it with a drill sargent attitude that dares anyone to correct me, not rude, but I do believe I have the authority to remove such a view from anyones eyesight,

blessings, Penny Raine
http://www.pennyraine.com/blog

Found you through another blog and am enjoying catching up! This post hit home with me as I am trying to raise a 14 yo daughter. How are we supposed to raise girls with good self esteems if they see that (SI) everywhere?

And now I have to go check out the little ones’ books to see if they are censored! LOL

And to think that I have a picture of a *nursing* calf on my blog for all the world to see! I should be censored.

Hmm, a cow without udders. Have you ever seen the movie Barnyard? Otis and Ben had udders along with the cows. Otis’ udders disturbed me. How confusing to kids. And who were the people that made this movie?

you gotta laugh…and laugh and laugh.

~simply~

I had to laugh about this one…I grew up on a dairy farm! Too funny…I had no idea people could be offended by udders? Ha!

I’ve never seen the Barnyard movie, but I’m cracking up at the thought of bulls with udders. Were they just…there?…or did they make an issue of it at some point?

Weird.

and Simply, you hit the nail square on the head. ;o)

Oh, yes, one must be udder-less unless in Barnyard. At which movie my four-year-old questioned “Why does he have four peters?” And, much to my horror, continues to refer to that movie as the one with “the cow with four peters.” It is far more important to have udderless cows than to make children think the boy bovine is showing off his parts.

Visiting thanks to RocksInMyDryer…and loving your blog!

The first thing that came to my mind is: Oh my, it wasn’t enough to airbrush out human nipples in magazines (a la Victoria’s Secret, etc.), now it’s too offensive to see even cows with potential to nourish their young! Apparently our culture’s sexualization of mammary glands has now extended into the animal kingdom! Even our cows are only good for looking at, not you know for actually following nature’s directive to feed their young!

I laughed out loud at this post, and especially at all of the spot on comments. Thanks for the giggle.

So Right!

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories